Saturday 25 September 2010

Cookery Books and Food Photography – a minor gripe!

Now I don’t know about you but I rarely buy a cookery book unless a high proportion of the recipes are accompanied by colour photographs.  For me a large part of the inspiration to cook a recipe I have seen comes from the way the finished dish looks in the photograph or from an overall description or introduction from the author or a reviewer.
Part of the
cook book collection

I have recently bought three more cook books to add to my completely over-the-top collection (currently stands at over 500 and increasing at a rate that any self-respecting rabbit would be proud of!)  My defence is that I have very few other vices these days – I don’t smoke, I don’t drink (well not that much), I don’t subscribe to Tiffany’s, I am not addicted to handbags, kitchen is already gadgeted up to the hilt and I no longer keep horses (which my ex husband used to say it would be cheaper to dig a big hole and pour £10 notes into it as to have horses!) so cookery books and shoes are my main vices (oh, I guess my car isn’t overly sensible and does guzzle petrol but hey …. ).  Anyway, back to the subject of the latest additions to my cook book empire, I have noticed with these three new books that I have a bit of a minor gripe about the photography.



“Flavour, a world of beautiful food” by Vicky Bhogal is a lovely recipe book, full of interesting and inspiring recipes from around the world – many of which appeal to me and which I intend to try or at least use as inspiration. However …… here comes the gripe…..whilst the book is full of stunning food photography, a high percentage of these glorious colour photos are of the main ingredient in its raw state e.g. an arty shot of lapsang souchong tea leaves spilling out onto a silver platter (see photo left).  Very nice, pretty even, but actually I would much rather see a photograph of the finished dish, “Lapsang Souchong scented salmon with nutmeg butter and kale.”  Likewise “Fennel, Salami and Pistachio Loaf” recipe is accompanied by a photo of pistachio nut slivers surrounding some unknown nut shaped ingredient (which I have to show my complete ignorance of its identity - someone please enlighten me?) The photo is a lovely combination of rosy pink and pistachio green hues (as illustrated right) but wouldn’t you rather see a photograph of the loaf in question?  The recipe itself I am not convinced I particularly want to dash into the kitchen to try out but maybe if I could see a photo of the finished article it might change my perception?

"Fluffy bunny"
syndrome
"Coast to Coast” by Rick Stein also uses fabulous colour photography of the raw ingredient in many places where it may serve some artistic purpose but again I feel misses the point a little in persuading the reader to make the recipe.  Take for example the recipe for “Rabbit cacciatore with grilled polenta” – the accompanying photo is that of the dead rabbit in all his fluffiness. Whilst I am not overly affected by the “fluffy factor” there are plenty of people who are and I feel sure people would prefer to see a pic of the final dish?  In the book’s defence, there are several occasions where there are two accompanying photographs opposite each other showing the artsy raw ingredient on one page and the finished dish using said ingredient on another – much better in my view (see raw figs and finished fig tart below). Having said all that, the recipes in the book do sound very nice and having watched some of the accompanying series on tv I am sure I will make some of the dishes within whether or not I like the aesthetics!

Figs au naturel
Fig tart
Candied sweet potatoes
“Lotte’s Country Kitchen” by Lotte Duncan is a lovely cook book, or at least it appeals to me for many reasons; I love her writing style, light hearted, slightly quirky but absolutely getting across the message that she loves food and loves to cook and wants everyone else to enjoy it too. Again the book has some beautiful photography and not confined to just food, raw or otherwise by any means.  There are photos of the garden, beautiful flowers, her decorated Christmas tree to name but a few non-food categories.  However these photos are used generally in the chapter introductions or in places not directly accompanying a recipe, whilst the recipes themselves, in the main, have a photo of the finished dish.  This, to me, is the perfect balance between producing a lovely “coffee table” book which can be flicked through and appreciated for its lovely illustrations and colourful photography whilst also acting as a visual stimulant to get off the sofa and stop just flicking through the book looking at the pretty pictures and get into that kitchen and get cooking!

Would love to hear your thoughts on this – obviously we are all entitled to our own opinions and I hasten to add that this is a very minor gripe as I actually really like all three books mentioned, but in my humble view, whilst I can appreciate beautiful photography whatever the subject matter, I personally would very much prefer to see what a finished dish should look like (provided of course you have a food stylist on hand in your own kitchen!) than to see the component parts in their natural state.

10 comments:

Koci said...

I completely agree! Photos are a major selling point when it comes to a cookbook for me. If I flip through the book and see page after page of mouthwatering pictures, it makes me want to give them all a try. If there's just a constant stream of recipes with no visuals to break them up, things get a little boring. I say the more photos, the better!

ruairi said...

I found you on UK food blogging network :-)

You have so many cookbooks, im jealous!!!! Im a student so I cant afford to buy as many as Id like but often take sneaky pics in waterstones on my mini cam !

Good photos are part of the deal, i agree, food pornography is important too! Also, i love cookbooks with really crass pictures...i bought one here in Germany last week with loads of really unnatural looking pictures...love it :-D and actually I love your blog too :-D

Phoodie said...

Hi ruairi - nice to "meet" you! Don't worry, I too started collecting cook book when I was a student and only bought books from those little independent shops that sold the book for a fraction of the cover price - in fact I still like book "bargains" now, hence my ever increasing collection. I have had several clear outs in the past year and sold a bulk lot of books at a car boot sale just to make space for some new ones!

Phoodie said...

Hi Koci - totally agree with more is definitely more on the photo front in cook books. Having said that I did buy "Sichuan Cookery" by Fuchsia Dunlop last week which has very, very few photos and those that it does have are bundled together in a few continuous pages in three places only - a much harder read for me. Surprising too given that it is a 260+ book with a cover price of £16.99 and covers a topic which to many people would be quite exotic and foreign and therefore harder to picture what the dish would look like.

Please Do Not Feed The Animals. said...

Agree completely. Have to say I am probably guilty of only ever cooking recipes for which I can see a photo of the finished product.
I'm trying to keep my cookbook numbers down at the moment as we will be moving to a smaller house soon. It's so hard to edit them but actually I find it easier to choose something to make now.
Love your blog.

Jo Romero said...

Funny, I noticed the same thing with Vicky Bhogal's book when I read it - gorgeous photos but only a few of the finished dish!

Phoodie said...

@Please do not feed the animals - thank you for your very kind comment on the blog ;-) Once when I moved house I bundled the cookbooks I hadn't referred to / looked at for a while into a couple of separate boxes from the "main" collection. In the new house I stored these boxes in the loft and in the 3 years I lived in that house I didn't miss those books at all so on the next house move I took the boxes, unopened, down to the charity shop!

@Jo - I don't know who the food stylists / publishers think these books are aimed at when they do these stylish shots. Cooks generally want to see the finished dish, as well as the food "porn" to use Ruairi's term ;-) otherwise the book is much more likely to end up as a coffee table book and not as a well thumbed and food stained credit to its author, as I am sure they would prefer!

Greedyrosie said...

Do you know, I don't care at all for photos (I realise I must be one of few, judging by these comments!). I can mostly imagine how things will turn out I guess (or maybe I just don't care). In fact, too many photos and I am grinding my teeth about photos at expense of space for recipes..

I have also just recently bought Fuscia Dunlop's Sichuan Cooking and it may be light on the pics, but I can promise the couple of recipes that I have tried have been amazing.
Anyway, I agree with the above, nice blog.

Matt said...

Phoodie, I'm with you on this one!

I like to see a photo of the finished recipe, as it gives me a good idea as to what it may taste like, as well as being something to aim for when cooking it!

I've recently reviewed Cook Step by Step (DK)and it has a photo for every recipe, and despite being aimed at beginner/intermediate cooks, it has some great recipes!!

Review is here http://www.foodforfriendsyeah.co.uk/2010/09/16/cook-step-by-step/ and it can be bought in my shop if you like the sound of it!

As for recipe books using photos of ingredients, I suspect this is just so they can get away with using stock photos and don't have to spend time on cooking and taking photos of the actual food?!

Karolina said...

What an impressing collection! I have been collecting my cookery books for last 4 years, but I think I only have about 25-30. :) I wish I could have more! :))) I have to count them...

Post a Comment